Well it wasn't MS that got Navision to where they are.
Hm, i must say, I've seen a big "boost" since Microsoft bought Navision. Number of Navision consultants have been (at least) doubled in Belgium... . About customers, I don't know.
And hey.
Maybe MS is good at putting out sales materials and doing promotions but isnt that only to the benefit of the partners and hence us(whereever your chair is in the organization)? NAV is still in my mind one of the best tools a business can have(Miklos said it better), and eventhough the direction the program is taking towards integration with other MS products isnt my favorite path, Im sure the MS devoloping team is still focused on keeping that basic structure that is the reason i love developing in Navision. Yes there has been a lot of 'noise' implemented mainly because they sometime try to please, more than implement strong basic structures, but all in all this is a pretty cool program.
I for one look forward to 5.0. For ye of little faith ill bet ya its more about features than streamlining.
The string limitation of 250 characters on COM objects has been reported here for several years here now. Nothing has been done about it. Can somebody tell me why?
Ahmed Rashed Amini
Independent Consultant/Developer
I thought that was what Navision original goal. No administration required. Simple server client installation. What has/will change?
Yeah, and my point was so that if Microsoft is forcing us to learn all these software, why not just bundle it all into one simple package that we learn and be done with it.
MS had sharepoint services and MS office and SQL for how long? I don't see customers buying them in one package. Now if they make them all into one product and have a universal client and sql server? hmmm.
Ahmed Rashed Amini
Independent Consultant/Developer
There is a difference in "MS is reading this forum" and "MS uses this forum as input to enhance their products".
The first statement is true. I don't know about the 2nd one.
Maybe it's true, but, from our (mibuso users) point of view it's the same thing... what good is it if they aren't concerning/reviewing opinions from one of the largest NAV community?
There is a difference in "MS is reading this forum" and "MS uses this forum as input to enhance their products".
The first statement is true. I don't know about the 2nd one.
Maybe it's true, but, from our (mibuso users) point of view it's the same thing... what good is it if they aren't concerning/reviewing opinions from one of the largest NAV community?
There is a difference in "MS is reading this forum" and "MS uses this forum as input to enhance their products".
The first statement is true. I don't know about the 2nd one.
Maybe it's true, but, from our (mibuso users) point of view it's the same thing... what good is it if they aren't concerning/reviewing opinions from one of the largest NAV community?
I do understand that that is MS's newsgroup, the question is: do they read it with attention? (same for mibuso)
If you make the topic as a "Suggestion to microsoft" it should be reviewed, but obviously if only a few people say "yes" to wanting the suggestion it will not have much weight.
Keep in mind that there are over 1,000,000 Navision users, Microsoft have to have a product that suits the majority of those 1,000,000, and that's what they do. Also rememebr that for those users, priority number one is being able to do their job, entering orders, enquiring on stock, shipping goods, running a set of financials. i.e. Business applicaitons.
If you make the topic as a "Suggestion to microsoft" it should be reviewed, but obviously if only a few people say "yes" to wanting the suggestion it will not have much weight.
Keep in mind that there are over 1,000,000 Navision users, Microsoft have to have a product that suits the majority of those 1,000,000, and that's what they do. Also rememebr that for those users, priority number one is being able to do their job, entering orders, enquiring on stock, shipping goods, running a set of financials. i.e. Business applicaitons.
I hope you are right :roll:
To clarify, I do not have negative opinion about that, after all MS made a tremendous package called MS Office and they didn't make that without user's help.
I'm just learned by many MS's answers that goes like "it's made by design and No, we will not change it whatsoever cause we don't think that is a bug or design problem".
I would rather look at this (and those) communities as great and helpfull place for dynamics users but with not too big, direct, impact to MS.
I can tell you from personal experience with everyone at Microsoft (without exception) that there is a VERY strong customer focused culture at MSFT. We might argue that they are not the fastest responding to it, but it is VERY important to MSFT what their customers think. When they bought NAV though they did not think it was going to be this good for them, so they just took a while to warm up.
I can tell you from personal experience with everyone at Microsoft (without exception) that there is a VERY strong customer focused culture at MSFT. We might argue that they are not the fastest responding to it, but it is VERY important to MSFT what their customers think. When they bought NAV though they did not think it was going to be this good for them, so they just took a while to warm up.
From the Microsoft people I met at Directions in Atlanta, GA, I agree very much with your statement.
Microsoft does geniuely care for their customers. All these changes are designed with customer focus. Now, whether these changes will actually bring customer happiness is a separate issue.
In version 5.1 we will have the ability to use lookup forms. =D>
This to me shows that Microsoft listen to their community. I made it known that this was a genuine need for Navision, I assume that I wasn't the only one.
Microsoft is very strong in the community, and they know how to use the community to make their products better. They listen to posts on all the forums, but not directly. Instead they have MVPs. MVPs listen to what people want, and pass that information to Microsoft.
But keep in mind that Microsoft are not going to change the product because one or two loud voices want it. They are going to sit down and listen to rational arguments and make sound business decisions. They are here to make money in the the long term, and that means happy customers, and that means good products.
Yes there have been a lot of things we don't like, but Microsoft buy out Navision is not only the best thing that ever happened to Navision, its also the only reason we are all still employed.
Hopefully MS just doesn't view that forum - they might get the impression that everything is OK due to the very few posts.
Yeah, the UI is terrible on that forum. I go on there every once in a while. However, most users on there eventually find their way here, thanks to you of course.
Comments
Hm, i must say, I've seen a big "boost" since Microsoft bought Navision. Number of Navision consultants have been (at least) doubled in Belgium... . About customers, I don't know.
Eric Wauters
MVP - Microsoft Dynamics NAV
My blog
Independent Consultant/Developer
blog: https://dynamicsuser.net/nav/b/ara3n
Believe me ... you're not going to double your consultants when there are no customers for them ... :-k
Eric Wauters
MVP - Microsoft Dynamics NAV
My blog
No PM,please use the forum. || May the <SOLVED>-attribute be in your title!
Eric Wauters
MVP - Microsoft Dynamics NAV
My blog
Yes.
And hey.
Maybe MS is good at putting out sales materials and doing promotions but isnt that only to the benefit of the partners and hence us(whereever your chair is in the organization)? NAV is still in my mind one of the best tools a business can have(Miklos said it better), and eventhough the direction the program is taking towards integration with other MS products isnt my favorite path, Im sure the MS devoloping team is still focused on keeping that basic structure that is the reason i love developing in Navision. Yes there has been a lot of 'noise' implemented mainly because they sometime try to please, more than implement strong basic structures, but all in all this is a pretty cool program.
I for one look forward to 5.0. For ye of little faith ill bet ya its more about features than streamlining.
Independent Consultant/Developer
blog: https://dynamicsuser.net/nav/b/ara3n
The first statement is true. I don't know about the 2nd one.
I wonder if Microsoft will release one product that will bundle the following for companies with 50 users:
Microsoft Dyanmics
Microsoft Office
Windows Server
MS SQL Server
Sharepoint Server
And the installation of everything in the bundle will be just using wizards. Basically Next... Next... Next... Finish type of deal.
This way, they just buy one product and they're done.
I know this is possible, so don't say it's not possible! :evil:
AP Commerce, Inc. = where I work
Getting Started with Dynamics NAV 2013 Application Development = my book
Implementing Microsoft Dynamics NAV - 3rd Edition = my 2nd book
Independent Consultant/Developer
blog: https://dynamicsuser.net/nav/b/ara3n
Sure there is. Now consultants can focus on the real business problems instead of on technical problems.
AP Commerce, Inc. = where I work
Getting Started with Dynamics NAV 2013 Application Development = my book
Implementing Microsoft Dynamics NAV - 3rd Edition = my 2nd book
Independent Consultant/Developer
blog: https://dynamicsuser.net/nav/b/ara3n
Yeah, and my point was so that if Microsoft is forcing us to learn all these software, why not just bundle it all into one simple package that we learn and be done with it.
AP Commerce, Inc. = where I work
Getting Started with Dynamics NAV 2013 Application Development = my book
Implementing Microsoft Dynamics NAV - 3rd Edition = my 2nd book
Independent Consultant/Developer
blog: https://dynamicsuser.net/nav/b/ara3n
Maybe it's true, but, from our (mibuso users) point of view it's the same thing... what good is it if they aren't concerning/reviewing opinions from one of the largest NAV community?
That's why they have this:
http://www.microsoft.com/Businesssolutions/Community/Newsgroups/dgbrowser/en-us/default.mspx?dg=microsoft.public.navision&lang=en&cr=US
Looks just like another dynamics community, only under MS's coat, though, I can't see is there MS's persons involved in conversations?
I'll give you a hint, see the bit that says "microsoft.com" it sort of gives it away. :shock:
I do understand that that is MS's newsgroup, the question is: do they read it with attention? (same for mibuso)
If you make the topic as a "Suggestion to microsoft" it should be reviewed, but obviously if only a few people say "yes" to wanting the suggestion it will not have much weight.
Keep in mind that there are over 1,000,000 Navision users, Microsoft have to have a product that suits the majority of those 1,000,000, and that's what they do. Also rememebr that for those users, priority number one is being able to do their job, entering orders, enquiring on stock, shipping goods, running a set of financials. i.e. Business applicaitons.
I hope you are right :roll:
To clarify, I do not have negative opinion about that, after all MS made a tremendous package called MS Office and they didn't make that without user's help.
I'm just learned by many MS's answers that goes like "it's made by design and No, we will not change it whatsoever cause we don't think that is a bug or design problem".
I would rather look at this (and those) communities as great and helpfull place for dynamics users but with not too big, direct, impact to MS.
RIS Plus, LLC
Believe it or not, I actually see Microsoft posting replys from time to time.
AP Commerce, Inc. = where I work
Getting Started with Dynamics NAV 2013 Application Development = my book
Implementing Microsoft Dynamics NAV - 3rd Edition = my 2nd book
From the Microsoft people I met at Directions in Atlanta, GA, I agree very much with your statement.
Microsoft does geniuely care for their customers. All these changes are designed with customer focus. Now, whether these changes will actually bring customer happiness is a separate issue.
AP Commerce, Inc. = where I work
Getting Started with Dynamics NAV 2013 Application Development = my book
Implementing Microsoft Dynamics NAV - 3rd Edition = my 2nd book
This to me shows that Microsoft listen to their community. I made it known that this was a genuine need for Navision, I assume that I wasn't the only one.
Microsoft is very strong in the community, and they know how to use the community to make their products better. They listen to posts on all the forums, but not directly. Instead they have MVPs. MVPs listen to what people want, and pass that information to Microsoft.
But keep in mind that Microsoft are not going to change the product because one or two loud voices want it. They are going to sit down and listen to rational arguments and make sound business decisions. They are here to make money in the the long term, and that means happy customers, and that means good products.
Yes there have been a lot of things we don't like, but Microsoft buy out Navision is not only the best thing that ever happened to Navision, its also the only reason we are all still employed.
Just a bad forum.. I usually try to direct them to mibuso.com and dynamicsusers.org.
Hopefully MS just doesn't view that forum - they might get the impression that everything is OK due to the very few posts.
http://www.BiloBeauty.com
http://www.autismspeaks.org
Yeah, the UI is terrible on that forum. I go on there every once in a while. However, most users on there eventually find their way here, thanks to you of course.
AP Commerce, Inc. = where I work
Getting Started with Dynamics NAV 2013 Application Development = my book
Implementing Microsoft Dynamics NAV - 3rd Edition = my 2nd book