Hello,
I have a problem with an home made table, maby someone can help me out.
I'f made a table lets call it A, in this table i want to show the order details from table C.
Do get this information i have to relate C and A, so id made a flowfield in table C refers to table B to get the Try-out No. (relation C->B = OFF no.,B->A = TR no.)
So the relation is done now i have the corespondending numbers in table C (TR numbers).
But when i make a relation between C and A using the TR numbers the order details dont apair.
Is it because the TR number fields in the tables C and B a flowfields ??
Do i have to sovle this problem with code ?
This figure is an example of the structure.
http://album.partyflock.nl/7570599.jpg
Many thanx in forward,
Marcos
Comments
MVP - Dynamics NAV
My BLOG
NAVERTICA a.s.
Sounds clear, but how can i backdoor this problem, probably using CAL code to copy flowfield data to a new field or using find rec code ??
If I understand correctly the structure is (without FlowFields):
A -> "TRXXXX" -> B <- "OFFXXXX" <- C
and you now needs to show data from C in A?
It is impossible, because now you have N:N connection and you cannot be sure that you will get just one record from C for the record from A and it means no lookup possible.
MVP - Dynamics NAV
My BLOG
NAVERTICA a.s.
MVP - Dynamics NAV
My BLOG
NAVERTICA a.s.
B = OFXXXX - [TRXXXX (flowfield to A)]
A = [OFXXXX (flowfield to
In the URL figure A and C are confused, damn....
i need the order details from C in A....
And how is connected A to B if both fields are FlowField :?: :?: :?:
MVP - Dynamics NAV
My BLOG
NAVERTICA a.s.
But through which field? On which field you set the table relation? In which table? Still it is not clear for me.
MVP - Dynamics NAV
My BLOG
NAVERTICA a.s.
it means that it is not
but
:?:
MVP - Dynamics NAV
My BLOG
NAVERTICA a.s.
I was busy with 10 things in the same time yesterday, thats why i made some mistakes in my question..
This is the situation....
C = TRXXXX
B = OFXXXX - [TRXXXX (flowfield to C)]
A = [OFXXXX (table relation to