Master scheduling issue (urgent)

ngupta
Member Posts: 9
Hi All,
I have a issue while running master scheduling , can anybody help me for the same .
First case : Suppose i run a master planning without selecting any item it takes all the orders from the Sale order window & create the plan accordingly considering free on - hand , which is perfectly what is required
Second case : Now if i run the schedulinmg for a particular item , it doesnt consider the on-hand & generates the full requirement . Is this the Standard AX master scheduling ?
E.g
FG(finished good ) - BOM (1 Qty )
---- RW1 as raw material on the BOM lines(10 pcs per Qty ) (on hand qty 100 )
---- RW2 as raw material again(20 pcs per qty ) (zero on hand )
now a planning for FG qty 10 is run , first case is perfect .
but second generates the requirement for RW1 also for which i already have the on-hand.which according to me fails the whole idea of MP .
Kindly help , Waiting for your valuable response .
Thanks ,
NG
I have a issue while running master scheduling , can anybody help me for the same .
First case : Suppose i run a master planning without selecting any item it takes all the orders from the Sale order window & create the plan accordingly considering free on - hand , which is perfectly what is required
Second case : Now if i run the schedulinmg for a particular item , it doesnt consider the on-hand & generates the full requirement . Is this the Standard AX master scheduling ?
E.g
FG(finished good ) - BOM (1 Qty )
---- RW1 as raw material on the BOM lines(10 pcs per Qty ) (on hand qty 100 )
---- RW2 as raw material again(20 pcs per qty ) (zero on hand )
now a planning for FG qty 10 is run , first case is perfect .
but second generates the requirement for RW1 also for which i already have the on-hand.which according to me fails the whole idea of MP .
Kindly help , Waiting for your valuable response .
Thanks ,
NG
0
Comments
-
Why is this urgent?
The answer is you should not run a filtered planning run, you should always run a full regenerative plan and filter out. Not always possible but if you set a filter you can filter out other dependent elements. Not sure if this would affect the on hand, depends on any other filters, but it may do, but feel free to log it with MS, and they will tell you not to filterThe art of teaching is clarity and the art of learning is to listen0 -
Thanks for your quick response .
If a user runs the complete scheduling without filters , user get lost in so much of the records which makes it very unclear as a whole .
Just wanted to know one thing as you mentioned to use the filters ,is there any way out to filter order wise . I believe a work around might help , lets see .
That means in standard we dont have the item based planning , il register the issue to MS in case i dont get the solution.
0 -
Well you can run it for everything and then filter the planned order screens based upon the filter you want - seems simple really.The art of teaching is clarity and the art of learning is to listen0
Categories
- All Categories
- 73 General
- 73 Announcements
- 66.6K Microsoft Dynamics NAV
- 18.7K NAV Three Tier
- 38.4K NAV/Navision Classic Client
- 3.6K Navision Attain
- 2.4K Navision Financials
- 116 Navision DOS
- 851 Navision e-Commerce
- 1K NAV Tips & Tricks
- 772 NAV Dutch speaking only
- 617 NAV Courses, Exams & Certification
- 2K Microsoft Dynamics-Other
- 1.5K Dynamics AX
- 320 Dynamics CRM
- 111 Dynamics GP
- 10 Dynamics SL
- 1.5K Other
- 990 SQL General
- 383 SQL Performance
- 34 SQL Tips & Tricks
- 35 Design Patterns (General & Best Practices)
- 1 Architectural Patterns
- 10 Design Patterns
- 5 Implementation Patterns
- 53 3rd Party Products, Services & Events
- 1.6K General
- 1.1K General Chat
- 1.6K Website
- 83 Testing
- 1.2K Download section
- 23 How Tos section
- 252 Feedback
- 12 NAV TechDays 2013 Sessions
- 13 NAV TechDays 2012 Sessions