Printer and Reports

Alex
Member Posts: 54
Hello to all NF Users !
I have following problem, I want to
set the then Report XXX should only print
on the Net Printer Nr. YYY. Okay, so fare. I
Use the Form 64 to define then
Userid All = Blank
Report ID = XXX
...
Printer = YYY ( one of more Net printer)
Okay, on my workstation it works, but if
i go to another workstation (account) it
doesnt work ! Were is the Bug ?!
I have following problem, I want to
set the then Report XXX should only print
on the Net Printer Nr. YYY. Okay, so fare. I
Use the Form 64 to define then
Userid All = Blank
Report ID = XXX
...
Printer = YYY ( one of more Net printer)
Okay, on my workstation it works, but if
i go to another workstation (account) it
doesnt work ! Were is the Bug ?!
Best regards
Alex Schubert
ERP & Navision
Dolphin Communication Technologies GmbH
Otto-Hahnstr. 1 c
D-69190 Walldorf
Alex Schubert
ERP & Navision
Dolphin Communication Technologies GmbH
Otto-Hahnstr. 1 c
D-69190 Walldorf
0
Comments
-
I had the same problem at a customer site.
So I had to add the same report for the same printer but WITH a user-id to the form 64 (there are 2 entries in the table: one with user-id blank, and one with a user-id. Then it worked for that particular user on that PC.No support using PM or e-mail - Please use this forum. BC TechDays 2024: 13 & 14 June 2024, Antwerp (Belgium)0 -
Hy Luc,
okay, i do it in this way:
USER ID REPORT ID Printername
205 RightFAX Fax Printer,Ne00:
206 \\DOLPHINFAX\Lexmark,Ne03:
208 \\DOLPHINFAX\Lexmark,Ne03:
405 RightFAX Fax Printer,Ne00:
AND
ME 205 RightFAX Fax Printer,Ne00:
ME 206 \\DOLPHINFAX\Lexmark,Ne03:
ME 208 RightFAX Fax Printer,Ne00:
ME 405 RightFAX Fax Printer,Ne00:
but it doesn't work :-(
Any ideas ????
Best regards
Alex Schubert
ERP & Navision
Dolphin Communication Technologies GmbH
Otto-Hahnstr. 1 c
D-69190 Walldorf
DolphinCT.de
[This message has been edited by Alex (edited 09-03-2000).]
[This message has been edited by Alex (edited 09-03-2000).]Best regards
Alex Schubert
ERP & Navision
Dolphin Communication Technologies GmbH
Otto-Hahnstr. 1 c
D-69190 Walldorf0 -
I just posted the reply on www.navision.net.
This again brings back the issue: Is there any way Luc and Erik can combine their efforts and create ONE combined list, so we - the users - don't have to look at two lists ... <img border="0" title="" alt="" src="images/smiles/icon_confused.gif" />
This is NO WAY ment as a "I like you better" or "I hate You" - thing, but just my humble oppinion. I really want to clap you both on your shoulders for the great work, but I think that two people doing the same thing, isn't effective <img border="0" title="" alt="" src="images/smiles/icon_wink.gif" />
Kind Regards
Henrik Helgesen,
Navision Solution Developer0 -
Hi
Just a some comments on the comments posted by Henrik Helgesen:
1. Why should we just have one place for Navísion users? I say, the more the better. I think it would be unwise to merge to two sites.
Monopoly has never been a good thing! I believe in the freedom of knowledge. Wouldn't the world be a boring place to live in, if all knowledge on a certain area was concentrated just in one place?
Imagine that all Java or C/C++ knowledge was just to be managed by one. It would give the owner of that site/server(Microsoft etc.) almost unlimited access of sorting or controlling the direction of development on these areas.
By the way. Doesn't Navision supply and pay the webspace for the www.navision.net, and they also agreed on allowing the use of the www.navision.net. As I see it, Navision has the possibility to control this site.
2. I also think that both Luc and Erik have been doing a great job constructing these sights, and I don't mind having to post replies or questions in two forums. I do that whenever I have questions on Java, C++ or any other issue.
Just my point of views.
Regards
Andreas
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Henrik Helgesen:
I just posted the reply on www.navision.net.
This again brings back the issue: Is there any way Luc and Erik can combine their efforts and create ONE combined list, so we - the users - don't have to look at two lists ... <img border="0" title="" alt="" src="images/smiles/icon_confused.gif" />
This is NO WAY ment as a "I like you better" or "I hate You" - thing, but just my humble oppinion. I really want to clap you both on your shoulders for the great work, but I think that two people doing the same thing, isn't effective <img border="0" title="" alt="" src="images/smiles/icon_wink.gif" />
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>0 -
Back to the printingproblem.
I think Your problem is the ne-numbers.
On the old discussion list on www.navision.net there is a solution to this problem. If its of any interest I can post a fob with the code to make Navision ignore the ne-numbers in all printing.
//Lars WestmanLars Westman
http://www.linkedin.com/in/larswestman0 -
Dear Lars,
Yes, we are interested in the fob. We'll look foreward to it.
Greatings Roel0 -
The file nenumber.zip is available now in the download-section.No support using PM or e-mail - Please use this forum. BC TechDays 2024: 13 & 14 June 2024, Antwerp (Belgium)0
Categories
- All Categories
- 73 General
- 73 Announcements
- 66.6K Microsoft Dynamics NAV
- 18.7K NAV Three Tier
- 38.4K NAV/Navision Classic Client
- 3.6K Navision Attain
- 2.4K Navision Financials
- 116 Navision DOS
- 851 Navision e-Commerce
- 1K NAV Tips & Tricks
- 772 NAV Dutch speaking only
- 617 NAV Courses, Exams & Certification
- 2K Microsoft Dynamics-Other
- 1.5K Dynamics AX
- 320 Dynamics CRM
- 111 Dynamics GP
- 10 Dynamics SL
- 1.5K Other
- 990 SQL General
- 383 SQL Performance
- 34 SQL Tips & Tricks
- 35 Design Patterns (General & Best Practices)
- 1 Architectural Patterns
- 10 Design Patterns
- 5 Implementation Patterns
- 53 3rd Party Products, Services & Events
- 1.6K General
- 1.1K General Chat
- 1.6K Website
- 83 Testing
- 1.2K Download section
- 23 How Tos section
- 252 Feedback
- 12 NAV TechDays 2013 Sessions
- 13 NAV TechDays 2012 Sessions