Ideas t create some new fields or table???

shanna1shanna1 Member Posts: 76
Hi guys!

I need different ideas here. ( using Nav4)

What type of fields or tables should I create to be able to manage those 2 scenarios:

1. An airplane part ( which is define as an item in Navision) can be applicable to ONE or MANY aircraft model. The applicability of the part is important for reporting (ex give me all the part applicable to a given aircraft). The applicability will be an aircraft model name.

2. Aircraft parts can be associated to an optional ATA number. This number indicates the section of the airplane where it applies. A part can have many ATA number.

PS: I saw that in the item table , there is a field call "Class". Can I use that field, if yes how?


Thanks.

Comments

  • SavatageSavatage Member Posts: 7,142
    just throwing it out there but
    are all the parts in 1 location? or do you have several locations?

    maybe the Item->Cross Reference table can be used here.. :-k
  • krikikriki Member, Moderator Posts: 9,118
    I would do something like this:
    Table "Aircraft Model". Defines all the aircraft models
    Field10:"Aircraft Model Code" (Primary key field)
    Field100:Description

    Table "Aircraft Part". Defines which item can be used in which aircraft model. (PS:you can also swich the 2 primary key fields, meaning that the primary key can also be "Item No.","Aircraft Model Code")
    Field10:"Aircraft Model Code". Linked to table "Aircraft Model". (Primary key field)
    Field20:"Item No.". Linked to table 27:"Item". (Primary key field)
    Field100:"ATA Number".

    Secondary indexes : "Item No.","Aircraft Model Code" and "ATA Number" (this last one if needed)

    -Report:give me all parts of an aircraft model => filter on field "Aircraft Part"."Aircraft Model Code"
    -given a ATA Number => search in the table and you know in which aircraft model it is used and which is the part.
    Regards,Alain Krikilion
    No PM,please use the forum. || May the <SOLVED>-attribute be in your title!


  • shanna1shanna1 Member Posts: 76
    Thanks Krikri. That was the type of suggestion i was looking for.
  • themavethemave Member Posts: 1,058
    Little late on the response, off for Thanksgiving vacation, but you could use the item cross reference field. would not need any new tables or fields.
  • DenSterDenSter Member Posts: 8,307
    I would use Production BOMs for this, and create production BOMs for each subassembly. You can then use the where used functionality to analyze the usage of individual items.
Sign In or Register to comment.