Sharing a custom field Extension Package
Developer101
Member Posts: 569
Hello,
I have an extension package installed in the customer database. In that extension there changes to the standard table (added some fields). Extension works fine and all good. But now I want to create another extension where I have a custom page which is accessing the same table and also accessing same custom field on the standard table. what base objects I use? Do I need to have that table as well? Will it be completely new one or should include that field? I have tried both and it wouldnt work. There must be possibility of sharing the fields are part of the extension , should they not? thanks.
I have an extension package installed in the customer database. In that extension there changes to the standard table (added some fields). Extension works fine and all good. But now I want to create another extension where I have a custom page which is accessing the same table and also accessing same custom field on the standard table. what base objects I use? Do I need to have that table as well? Will it be completely new one or should include that field? I have tried both and it wouldnt work. There must be possibility of sharing the fields are part of the extension , should they not? thanks.
United Kingdom
0
Answers
-
is it V1 or v2 extensions?
you should have code base of extension 1 and create new extension on top of it as a dependency extension1 -
I have code base but second extension i want to create on top of first one where customer can uninstall if they dont need but keep first extension,any ideas?
ThanksUnited Kingdom0 -
yes, as second extension is dependent upon first. user can uninstall second one.
but he cant use second one without first one.1 -
I understand but how to achieve the second one? What will be base objects when doing the compare? Im taking the ones that were used for first extension but getting error on the custom page when publishing saying the custom field on the standard table (that is used in first extension) is missing!! Is not missing, i have included in the base objects , please helpUnited Kingdom0
-
did you mention dependency while creating your second extension in manifest file0
-
No I haven’t is this what i need to do? Can they not be independent and still use sane custom fields in standard table?United Kingdom0
-
no, you have to make them dependent1
Categories
- All Categories
- 73 General
- 73 Announcements
- 66.7K Microsoft Dynamics NAV
- 18.7K NAV Three Tier
- 38.4K NAV/Navision Classic Client
- 3.6K Navision Attain
- 2.4K Navision Financials
- 116 Navision DOS
- 851 Navision e-Commerce
- 1K NAV Tips & Tricks
- 772 NAV Dutch speaking only
- 617 NAV Courses, Exams & Certification
- 2K Microsoft Dynamics-Other
- 1.5K Dynamics AX
- 324 Dynamics CRM
- 111 Dynamics GP
- 10 Dynamics SL
- 1.5K Other
- 990 SQL General
- 383 SQL Performance
- 34 SQL Tips & Tricks
- 35 Design Patterns (General & Best Practices)
- 1 Architectural Patterns
- 10 Design Patterns
- 5 Implementation Patterns
- 53 3rd Party Products, Services & Events
- 1.6K General
- 1.1K General Chat
- 1.6K Website
- 83 Testing
- 1.2K Download section
- 23 How Tos section
- 252 Feedback
- 12 NAV TechDays 2013 Sessions
- 13 NAV TechDays 2012 Sessions
