Howdy, Stranger!
Categories
- All Categories
- 73 General
- 73 Announcements
- 66.6K Microsoft Dynamics NAV
- 18.7K NAV Three Tier
- 38.4K NAV/Navision Classic Client
- 3.6K Navision Attain
- 2.4K Navision Financials
- 115 Navision DOS
- 854 Navision e-Commerce
- 1K NAV Tips & Tricks
- 772 NAV Dutch speaking only
- 615 NAV Courses, Exams & Certification
- 2K Microsoft Dynamics-Other
- 1.5K Dynamics AX
- 305 Dynamics CRM
- 109 Dynamics GP
- 10 Dynamics SL
- 1.5K Other
- 993 SQL General
- 384 SQL Performance
- 34 SQL Tips & Tricks
- 34 Design Patterns (General & Best Practices)
- Architectural Patterns
- 10 Design Patterns
- 5 Implementation Patterns
- 53 3rd Party Products, Services & Events
- 1.7K General
- 1.1K General Chat
- 1.6K Website
- 79 Testing
- 1.2K Download section
- 23 How Tos section
- 260 Feedback
- 12 NAV TechDays 2013 Sessions
- 13 NAV TechDays 2012 Sessions
Danish IOIUBL validation error InvoicePeriod
BrianR
Member Posts: 2
I have downscaled the objects from "PS53491_DK OIOUBL Electronic Invoices" to a NAV4SP3.
But during OIOUBL 2.02 validation test, the created e-Invoice failed with the following error:
"The 'urn:oasis:names:specification:ubl:schema:xsd:CommonAggregateComponents-2:InvoicePeriod' element is not declared"
And so did the Nav2013 exported e-Invoice as well.
That was expected because the tag InvoicePeriod is not supported by the "PS53491" objects. But should it have been? And if it should, how should it be declared?
(have unsuccessful tried a lot of options… ](*,) ). Or why does the validation fail the NAV e-Invoice format?
:!: :idea:
Hmmm The Danish government's digitalization board had changed the schema on the 15'th of sept. but did not find that worth mentioning on the validation site...
By former standard the document validated just fine... :?
But during OIOUBL 2.02 validation test, the created e-Invoice failed with the following error:
"The 'urn:oasis:names:specification:ubl:schema:xsd:CommonAggregateComponents-2:InvoicePeriod' element is not declared"
And so did the Nav2013 exported e-Invoice as well.
That was expected because the tag InvoicePeriod is not supported by the "PS53491" objects. But should it have been? And if it should, how should it be declared?
(have unsuccessful tried a lot of options… ](*,) ). Or why does the validation fail the NAV e-Invoice format?
:!: :idea:
Hmmm The Danish government's digitalization board had changed the schema on the 15'th of sept. but did not find that worth mentioning on the validation site...
By former standard the document validated just fine... :?
0