Howdy, Stranger!
Categories
- All Categories
- 73 General
- 73 Announcements
- 66.6K Microsoft Dynamics NAV
- 18.7K NAV Three Tier
- 38.4K NAV/Navision Classic Client
- 3.6K Navision Attain
- 2.4K Navision Financials
- 115 Navision DOS
- 854 Navision e-Commerce
- 1K NAV Tips & Tricks
- 772 NAV Dutch speaking only
- 615 NAV Courses, Exams & Certification
- 2K Microsoft Dynamics-Other
- 1.5K Dynamics AX
- 305 Dynamics CRM
- 109 Dynamics GP
- 10 Dynamics SL
- 1.5K Other
- 993 SQL General
- 384 SQL Performance
- 34 SQL Tips & Tricks
- 34 Design Patterns (General & Best Practices)
- Architectural Patterns
- 10 Design Patterns
- 5 Implementation Patterns
- 53 3rd Party Products, Services & Events
- 1.7K General
- 1.1K General Chat
- 1.6K Website
- 79 Testing
- 1.2K Download section
- 23 How Tos section
- 260 Feedback
- 12 NAV TechDays 2013 Sessions
- 13 NAV TechDays 2012 Sessions
LS Retail: One company or Data Replication + 2 comp. ?
HaaryZ
Member Posts: 2
Hi there,
What's the best way to configure NAV and LS Retail to treat each ''store'' as an independant company (own g/l accounts with dimensions tags for example).
Both stores must share same clients DB, products, promotion etc... but in real life, they are 2 different legal entities, but they both have the same g/l structure, financial year end, owner, etc..
What's the best way to use only one company in NAV / LS (with 2 locations) and map each store to its own g/l accounts, and handle inter-co ops in a proper manner ( trigger some kind of ledger entry when stock is moving from store A to
Right now, there is no HQ or backoffice to consolidate and stores run autonomus (even if they are managed by the same people). Our decision to move to a modern ERP was made so that we could handle all the products and clients informations from one place, and avoid double and triple data entry. The concept of "master data" is something that we are looking forward to .
There is no "leading" shop, as they both have the same size and share 99% of the products structure and processes. So the base data is nearly the same but they run autonomous.
Stock is owned by each shop autonomus (they have separate suppliers accounts, so 2 accounts for every supplier).
Everything will be hosted on Azure, and an eCommerce website will be connected to the ERP (the eCommerce connector can only connect to one database).
Right now, in the old ERP system, each store sees the other one as a supplier. So sales and PO are required for every stock movement, wich is time consuming as it's not automated... and yes, we do a lot of interco sales.
Thanks !
What's the best way to configure NAV and LS Retail to treat each ''store'' as an independant company (own g/l accounts with dimensions tags for example).
Both stores must share same clients DB, products, promotion etc... but in real life, they are 2 different legal entities, but they both have the same g/l structure, financial year end, owner, etc..
What's the best way to use only one company in NAV / LS (with 2 locations) and map each store to its own g/l accounts, and handle inter-co ops in a proper manner ( trigger some kind of ledger entry when stock is moving from store A to
Right now, there is no HQ or backoffice to consolidate and stores run autonomus (even if they are managed by the same people). Our decision to move to a modern ERP was made so that we could handle all the products and clients informations from one place, and avoid double and triple data entry. The concept of "master data" is something that we are looking forward to .
There is no "leading" shop, as they both have the same size and share 99% of the products structure and processes. So the base data is nearly the same but they run autonomous.
Stock is owned by each shop autonomus (they have separate suppliers accounts, so 2 accounts for every supplier).
Everything will be hosted on Azure, and an eCommerce website will be connected to the ERP (the eCommerce connector can only connect to one database).
Right now, in the old ERP system, each store sees the other one as a supplier. So sales and PO are required for every stock movement, wich is time consuming as it's not automated... and yes, we do a lot of interco sales.
Thanks !
0