Howdy, Stranger!
Categories
- All Categories
- 73 General
- 73 Announcements
- 66.6K Microsoft Dynamics NAV
- 18.6K NAV Three Tier
- 38.4K NAV/Navision Classic Client
- 3.6K Navision Attain
- 2.4K Navision Financials
- 115 Navision DOS
- 854 Navision e-Commerce
- 1K NAV Tips & Tricks
- 772 NAV Dutch speaking only
- 615 NAV Courses, Exams & Certification
- 2K Microsoft Dynamics-Other
- 1.5K Dynamics AX
- 295 Dynamics CRM
- 109 Dynamics GP
- 10 Dynamics SL
- 1.5K Other
- 993 SQL General
- 384 SQL Performance
- 34 SQL Tips & Tricks
- 34 Design Patterns (General & Best Practices)
- Architectural Patterns
- 10 Design Patterns
- 5 Implementation Patterns
- 53 3rd Party Products, Services & Events
- 1.7K General
- 1.1K General Chat
- 1.6K Website
- 79 Testing
- 1.2K Download section
- 23 How Tos section
- 259 Feedback
- 12 NAV TechDays 2013 Sessions
- 13 NAV TechDays 2012 Sessions
Jobs Question
njward
Member Posts: 38
Hello, we are just working through jobs to see if it is something we can use within our organisation.
One of the things we are struggling with is when an item is ordered for the job and booked in, we can see the transaction that books the item in and straight out of stock. What we can't see where we can view that this item is sitting inside the job.
This item may sit in the job for 12 months before we complete the work and it would be good if we could see this item in the system.
Is there a way that we can report that this/these items are held within the job?
Apologies if I have not explained this very well.
Thanks
Nick
One of the things we are struggling with is when an item is ordered for the job and booked in, we can see the transaction that books the item in and straight out of stock. What we can't see where we can view that this item is sitting inside the job.
This item may sit in the job for 12 months before we complete the work and it would be good if we could see this item in the system.
Is there a way that we can report that this/these items are held within the job?
Apologies if I have not explained this very well.
Thanks
Nick
0