Filter on FlowField

ta5ta5 Member Posts: 1,164
edited 2013-05-17 in SQL Performance
Hi
I'm working with a quite big solution, the overall performance is very good, everyone is happy. However, I've been asked a few times, whether and how it would be possible to speed up filtering on flow fields, for example on "Balance"-Field on Table customers.
Thanks in advance
Thomas

Comments

  • Marije_BrummelMarije_Brummel Member, Moderators Design Patterns Posts: 4,262
    Which version of NAV are you running? This is easier to achieve with NAV2013
  • ta5ta5 Member Posts: 1,164
    Hi Mark
    Its 2009. If you don't mind, can you describe a possible solution for both versions? At the moment I only need a general approach (idea), so no need for scripts, etc.
    Thanks in advance
    Thomas
  • pdjpdj Member Posts: 643
    In older versions of NAV (before the indexed views) each Key had a property called SIFTLevelToMaintain.
    That made it possible to decide exactly which levels of a Key should have maintained an accumulated value.
    This is gone now, and NAV only creates accumulated values for the leafs of the index.

    To get the same flexibility as before you need to create a new Key for each level you wish to have.
    I would expect you can optimize filtering on Cust.Balance by ensuring you have a Key in the Detailed Cust. Ledg. Entry table with only the Customer No. field, and of course Amount as SumIndexField (assuming you don't set Dimension Filter or Currency Filter). That should optimize it a lot, as it currently is using this Key: "Customer No.,Initial Entry Due Date,Posting Date,Currency Code" - which has a LOT of index entries. You might need to place the index before the original Key. I think NAV just uses the first SIFT index it can.
    (To reduce the overhead by maintaining the actual index, you could mark it as MaintainSQLIndex=No)

    Please let me know if it works :-)
    Regards
    Peter
  • ta5ta5 Member Posts: 1,164
    Hi Peter
    Thanks a lot for your answer. I have tested it, but with no considerable gain. I guess I have to use sql server profiler to see what sql server does, means see the impact on the query plan.
    Regards
    Thomas
  • pdjpdj Member Posts: 643
    Strange... :-k
    I'll let you know if I come up with a reason or different suggestion. :|
    Regards
    Peter
Sign In or Register to comment.