Because not everybody has a Outlook? Because better way (for me) is sending mails using universal SMTP Client ? And this *.dll is just a simple SMTP Client
You have a problem with this *.dll ? Why you asking about it?
No, No, when codeunit 397 is used, outlook already must be installed.
My question is "why is there a dll used as a wrapper around the outlook library". Because some methods are now not exposed I still need to use automation with the outlook library..
Hehe sorry, my mistake. I'm using codeunit 400 for a sending mails, not codeunit 375. Maybe you should use it too, instead 375? This codeunit use SMTP servers for sending mails, and don't need an outlook.
Comments
You have a problem with this *.dll ? Why you asking about it?
http://www.nav.info.pl (The first polish blog about Microsoft Dynamics NAV)
My question is "why is there a dll used as a wrapper around the outlook library". Because some methods are now not exposed I still need to use automation with the outlook library..
http://www.nav.info.pl (The first polish blog about Microsoft Dynamics NAV)