SETFILTER and SETRANGE on one field

randrews

Hi.

I need dynamicaly set several filter to one field.
I.e. sumary filter (values may be another)
myvar := 'VALUE1';
myvar := '';
myvar := 'VALUE2';
myvar := 'VALUE 3 BLANK';

SETRANGE(Field,myvar) - erase previous filter.
Doing
TextFilter += (myvar+'&');
SETFILTER(Field,TextFilter)
Then dificulty on checkin values with blank ''. Checkin if first value myvar<>'' (filter '&Value1&value2' wrong). Checking last value (then TextFilter += myvar, and not TextFilter += (myvar+'&');)

I can do it, but code is very bulky for that simple task.

May be somebody have a simple decision?

jreynolds

If you want a logical AND to combine your filters then you can use filter groups and set each filter in a different filter group.

kine

I think that there is no 'simple' solution. There is only 'complex' solution which must do all checks. In which way, it is on you... :-)

You can be inspired of code from Form 18 from function GetSelectionFilter which take all selected records and create the filter string for them. Automatically use .. or | based on selected records.

If you modify this code, you can use it for your need.

[Edited after posted]
Sorry... I forget that this code is not calculating with empty values.. ](*,) :-#

kine

Another solution:

Do checking of all empty values and replace them with string '%1'
Then do adding into one string...

use

SETFILTER(Field,TextFilter,'') 

It means that all %1 will be correctly replaced with empty string.

if the result is ''&VALUE2&VALUE3&'' is correct, ''&'' is equal to '' ('' is empty string) :-)

Have you fixed count of values or it is dynamic?

randrews

First of all, i am mistaken
TextFilter += (myvar+'&'); \\wrong
TextFilter += (myvar+'|'); \\right

Count of values is dinamicaly changes.
Realy it deends on table SomeTable.
SomeTable.SETRANGE(Fild1,...)
SomeTable.SETRANGE(Fild2,...)
And all values SomeTable.Field3 is values for filtering second table.
REPEAT
TestFilter += SomeTable.Field3 +'|';
UNTIL SomeTable.NEXT =0;
SecondTable.SETFILTER(SomeField,TestFilter)

kine

randrews wrote:

First of all, i am mistaken
TextFilter += (myvar+'&'); \\wrong
TextFilter += (myvar+'|'); \\right

Count of values is dinamicaly changes.
Realy it deends on table SomeTable.
SomeTable.SETRANGE(Fild1,...)
SomeTable.SETRANGE(Fild2,...)
And all values SomeTable.Field3 is values for filtering second table.
REPEAT
TestFilter += SomeTable.Field3 +'|';
UNTIL SomeTable.NEXT =0;
SecondTable.SETFILTER(SomeField,TestFilter)

& vs | - a thought about it and I wonder that it is AND and not OR... :-)

my corrected code for you:

TestFilter := '';
IF SomeTable.FIND('-') then begin
  REPEAT
    if  SomeTable.Field3 = '' then
      TestFilter += '%1|'
    else
      TestFilter += SomeTable.Field3 +'|'; 
  UNTIL SomeTable.NEXT =0
  TestFilter := DELSTR(TestFilter,StrLen(TestFilter));  //for deleting last |
end else
  TestFilter := 'somevalue if nothing to filter';

SecondTable.SETFILTER(SomeField,TestFilter,'');

another version

TestFilter := '';
IF SomeTable.FIND('-') then begin
  REPEAT
    if  SomeTable.Field3 = '' then
      if TestFilter = '' then
        TestFilter := '%1'; 
      else
        TestFilter += '|%1'
    else
      if TestFilter = '' then
        TestFilter := SomeTable.Field3
      else
        TestFilter += '|' + SomeTable.Field3 ; 
  UNTIL SomeTable.NEXT =0
end else
  TestFilter := 'somevalue if nothing to filter';

SecondTable.SETFILTER(SomeField,TestFilter,'');

and another one:

TestFilter := '';
IF SomeTable.FIND('-') then begin
  REPEAT
    if  SomeTable.Field3 = '' then
       FValue := '%1'
    else
       FValue := SomeTable.Field3;
    if TestFilter = '' then
      TestFilter := FValue 
    else
      TestFilter += '|'+FValue; 
  UNTIL SomeTable.NEXT =0
end else
  TestFilter := 'somevalue if nothing to filter';

SecondTable.SETFILTER(SomeField,TestFilter,'');

randrews

Thanks a lot, kine, for writing code. It is exactly what i needed My code was more biger.

And thanks to all who helped and writed here