Invisible AssistEdit

Rob_Hansen
Member Posts: 296
Has anyone encountered an issue where the AssistEdit button is invisible beside a field? I have a field on a Card type page with AssistEdit = Yes and code OnAssistEdit, but there is no AssistEdit button beside the field. It actually IS there (you can mouseover it and get the tooltip, and you can click it) but it's invisible. Has anyone else had this problem?
Rob Hansen
http://www.epimatic.com
http://www.epimatic.com
0
Comments
-
rdhansen wrote:Has anyone encountered an issue where the AssistEdit button is invisible beside a field? I have a field on a Card type page with AssistEdit = Yes and code OnAssistEdit, but there is no AssistEdit button beside the field. It actually IS there (you can mouseover it and get the tooltip, and you can click it) but it's invisible. Has anyone else had this problem?
There is a property to set this, autohide or alwaysvisible or something like that.David Singleton0 -
I'm having trouble finding a property for that...I checked at both the table and page levels.Rob Hansen
http://www.epimatic.com0 -
rdhansen wrote:I'm having trouble finding a property for that...I checked at both the table and page levels.
:oops: sorry I didn't realize this was in the Three Tier Forum, I was referring to Classic.David Singleton0 -
If there is code in the OnAssistEdit trigger, the property can be left default. Have you tried that?0
-
Here's a screenshot. I have code OnAssistEdit for the "Task Code" field. There is no code to change the visibility of this field dynamically. I have tried setting the AssistEdit property to the default setting as well as "Yes", but both behave the same way. You can tell the AssistEdit button is there as the tooltip is showing where my mousepointer is (and I can click it) but it's invisible. I expect I'll need to submit this to microsoft, but let me know if any of you have seen this before.Rob Hansen
http://www.epimatic.com0 -
-
-
Usually a card displays the caption in green between the actions and fasttabs.
I would have to reverse engineer the entire object to see what goes wrong. Its difficult to tell with the information we have now.0 -
-
ohhh
.
We always suppose that every page is begin used in RTC should have reference to any form(you are converting page from form) so why didn't you made form unless you need to set all assist property in page.0 -
This is an extensive add-on for the RTC...it's not being upgraded from classic objects. We directly create RTC pages. We don't create forms and then upgrade them...that's an inefficient process in my opinion (for people who are continuing to avoid learning the RTC natively).Rob Hansen
http://www.epimatic.com0 -
rdhansen wrote:...We directly create RTC pages. We don't create forms and then upgrade them...that's an inefficient process in my opinion (for people who are continuing to avoid learning the RTC natively).
Sorry I can't answer what is wrong with your page, but I'm happy to hear I'm not the only one that has this point of view. We stopped Classic development a couple months ago on our product and it's forced us to think RTC right from the design stage now. Good stuff!!!! =D>0 -
Well, like it or not, it's the direction NAV is going so everyone needs to get on board. The fact is, you do have to think about how to approach some things differently using pages. Once you get your mindset adjusted, life is fine. Sure there are some limitations that I wish we had more flexibility to control, but honestly I enjoy creating pages now more than classic forms. It's actually been probably a year now since I've even created a classic client form (we do still support some clients on classic, but the ones I handle are not doing much new development at this point).
Still, the flukey stuff like this invisible AssistEdit does bug me...Rob Hansen
http://www.epimatic.com0 -
Sounds good.
Anyway, just for a workaround :idea: :
Try create a classic form, and then transform it into pages, and see how it goes.
Check the differences between them
I think that would be better, than have to stay at nowhere waiting for bugfixes.
I like your idealism for pages, but sometimes we have to "give up" a little bit, just to achieve the same goal, just for a temporary moment.:-#
Regards,
Andwian0
Categories
- All Categories
- 73 General
- 73 Announcements
- 66.6K Microsoft Dynamics NAV
- 18.7K NAV Three Tier
- 38.4K NAV/Navision Classic Client
- 3.6K Navision Attain
- 2.4K Navision Financials
- 116 Navision DOS
- 851 Navision e-Commerce
- 1K NAV Tips & Tricks
- 772 NAV Dutch speaking only
- 617 NAV Courses, Exams & Certification
- 2K Microsoft Dynamics-Other
- 1.5K Dynamics AX
- 320 Dynamics CRM
- 111 Dynamics GP
- 10 Dynamics SL
- 1.5K Other
- 990 SQL General
- 383 SQL Performance
- 34 SQL Tips & Tricks
- 35 Design Patterns (General & Best Practices)
- 1 Architectural Patterns
- 10 Design Patterns
- 5 Implementation Patterns
- 53 3rd Party Products, Services & Events
- 1.6K General
- 1.1K General Chat
- 1.6K Website
- 83 Testing
- 1.2K Download section
- 23 How Tos section
- 252 Feedback
- 12 NAV TechDays 2013 Sessions
- 13 NAV TechDays 2012 Sessions