Is it normal for ALL RTC reports to be messed up??

Votuc

I'm just wondering if anyone else is having the same problems I am having....

We upgraded a client from Classic NAV to the RTC. It just seems like all RTC versions of the reports have some sort of layout problem. Either they are really ridiculously wide (due to the tables in the body) or the fields are in the wrong places, etc. ](*,)

julkifli33

i also confused with these RTC reports

Belias

are you talking about standard reports?
yes, the layout can be different, because the reports have to be rethinked: it's not an easy task and the new report designer is "human errors" prone: there is a huge quantity of property and of places to put them to be aware.

Alex_Chow

The first mistake Microsoft did with this RDLC thing is trying to create the standard NAV reports into RDLC. An absolute waste of time and money on their part.

I must rather them redo the reports properly in RDLC.

Belias

Alex Chow wrote:

The first mistake Microsoft did with this RDLC thing is trying to create the standard NAV reports into RDLC. An absolute waste of time and money on their part.

I must rather them redo the reports properly in RDLC.

i don't <fully> agree with you: they're useless for the application, but very useful for training!

Alex_Chow

Belias wrote:

i don't <fully> agree with you: they're useless for the application, but very useful for training!

How so? :-k

Belias

I mean for developer's training, not end-user training.
When reporting came out, there was not an adequate documentation, and all we could do was to copy/understand the standard and adapt it to our needs.
i've learnt the use of the lists, the page numbering, the image showing and other things from report 206 only.
Well, a better documentation would have made these reports completely useless, indeed :whistle: