I am a training to be a NAV consultant and have come across a scenario which i hope you can assist with. When a sales price campaign is created for an item and is linked to a specific segment, regardless of whether a customer is set within the specifics of the campaign / segment, the campaign price appears on sales quotes and sales orders even though a customer is not set within the parameters of the campaign / segment. This also applies regardless of inputting the campaign number into the header of the sales quote or sales order.
For example, the criteria I set within the segment was Business Relations = Customers and Job Responsibilities = Purchase. The campaign price is also offered to Customers who have a job responsibility different than Purchase.
Thanks in advance.
0
Comments
No PM,please use the forum. || May the <SOLVED>-attribute be in your title!
So under your Campagin you have created a campagin price group linked to specfic items with perhaps date and other parameters.
It sounds like the parameters in your segment are the issue. EG find a customer or customer contact that you know shopuld not be in this segment base on you should then follow the contact and see what segments they are linked to.
It may be your filter on the segment is setup incorrectly, i doubt its a bug a similiar scenario worked for me in cronus
Yes, I was following the manual for creating Sales Campaigns.
I have now discovered where I have gone wrong. I changed the Job Responsibility for a Contact from Purchasing to Marketing, after the segment criteria was originally created for Job Responsibility = Purchasing. I then re-ran the segment wizard to include Job Responsibility = Purchasing. On doing this, the same contact still appeared within the segment criteria even though I had changed the Contact to Job Responsibility = Marketing. What I realise now is that I should have DELETED the segment lines before running the segment wizard, and then re-run the segment wizard. After doing this, the correct number of segment lines was displayed.
Thanks again.