Howdy, Stranger!
Categories
- All Categories
- 73 General
- 73 Announcements
- 66.6K Microsoft Dynamics NAV
- 18.6K NAV Three Tier
- 38.4K NAV/Navision Classic Client
- 3.6K Navision Attain
- 2.4K Navision Financials
- 115 Navision DOS
- 854 Navision e-Commerce
- 1K NAV Tips & Tricks
- 772 NAV Dutch speaking only
- 615 NAV Courses, Exams & Certification
- 2K Microsoft Dynamics-Other
- 1.5K Dynamics AX
- 296 Dynamics CRM
- 109 Dynamics GP
- 10 Dynamics SL
- 1.5K Other
- 993 SQL General
- 384 SQL Performance
- 34 SQL Tips & Tricks
- 34 Design Patterns (General & Best Practices)
- Architectural Patterns
- 10 Design Patterns
- 5 Implementation Patterns
- 53 3rd Party Products, Services & Events
- 1.7K General
- 1.1K General Chat
- 1.6K Website
- 79 Testing
- 1.2K Download section
- 23 How Tos section
- 259 Feedback
- 12 NAV TechDays 2013 Sessions
- 13 NAV TechDays 2012 Sessions
Charge(item) - can we use it this way?
Josetxo
Member Posts: 92
Hello all,
We are running NAV 4.0 SP1 in Spain.
We have a subsidiary in the US in which we have created a series of "Charge(Item)" records that have their Posting Groups assigned, so they can create their related accounting records correctly.
We thought this was the way for our people to efficiently add sales lines to sales orders, with those lines holding the charges for product installations, trainings, repairings.. .
The bad news is that we cannot register a sales invoice that has this kind of lines without previously making the item charge assignment (through Line/Item Charge Assginment).
This is the way the NAV standard works. But there are situations in which this might not be desirable (think about an annual charge for product warranty, or a end-user training where there is not a direct relationship between the charge and an item ledger entry).
Is it possible to avoid this restriction? Or, how do you achieve this goal thorugh the NAV standard - maybe we are doing some wrong assumptions.
Many thanks in advance.
We are running NAV 4.0 SP1 in Spain.
We have a subsidiary in the US in which we have created a series of "Charge(Item)" records that have their Posting Groups assigned, so they can create their related accounting records correctly.
We thought this was the way for our people to efficiently add sales lines to sales orders, with those lines holding the charges for product installations, trainings, repairings.. .
The bad news is that we cannot register a sales invoice that has this kind of lines without previously making the item charge assignment (through Line/Item Charge Assginment).
This is the way the NAV standard works. But there are situations in which this might not be desirable (think about an annual charge for product warranty, or a end-user training where there is not a direct relationship between the charge and an item ledger entry).
Is it possible to avoid this restriction? Or, how do you achieve this goal thorugh the NAV standard - maybe we are doing some wrong assumptions.
Many thanks in advance.
0
Comments
It's not possible unless you change some code. Charge (Item) were designed to update item cost without changing item inventory.
I think what you are looking for is services invoicing, and here in Spain normally we resolve it making invoices using G/L Accounts directly under groups 6 and 7.
Regards from Valencia.
so far, so good
thank you for your reply.
Yes, we are looking for that kind of service invoicing, and we are rsesolving it in Spain as you suggested (6 and 7 groups in G/L accounts).
How should this be done in the US? Is the Charge(item) the tool, with some code modification? Or is there any other way to achieve this?
Regards!
sorry
so far, so good
Can anybody give me a guideline on this?
Best regards,
Josetxo
AP Commerce, Inc. = where I work
Getting Started with Dynamics NAV 2013 Application Development = my book
Implementing Microsoft Dynamics NAV - 3rd Edition = my 2nd book
Regards,
Josetxo