1) The native database will not be supported in future versions of the product
2) While the native database used to be faster at calculating FlowFields it is no longer the case. As far as I know SQL outperforms Native in pretty much every area
3) SQL costs a lot of money. It's east to go into to $10k+ range with only SQL Server Standard
Native DB is more self-sustaining, doesn't need performance tweaking and doesn't need to be monitored as much as SQL
Native also has a database size limit which SQl does not.
Answers
2) While the native database used to be faster at calculating FlowFields it is no longer the case. As far as I know SQL outperforms Native in pretty much every area
3) SQL costs a lot of money. It's east to go into to $10k+ range with only SQL Server Standard
My Blog - nav.education
Also with SQL it is way easier to implement a good back up strategy. It is more flexible than the native backup.
Regards,
Willy
Native also has a database size limit which SQl does not.
http://www.BiloBeauty.com
http://www.autismspeaks.org
-Easier to connect SQL with other packets.
There is a lot of pro and contro for both DB's.
But I think this should be the winning factor:
So for new installations, I would always go with SQL server.
No PM,please use the forum. || May the <SOLVED>-attribute be in your title!