Hi Everyone,
While posting purchase invoices for stock items in NAV 4.0 SP1, a user has mistakenly posted Indirect costs for the stock items.
Since these stock items have already been sold, it is not possible to enter a credit memo for same.
Please advise how these indirect costs can be reversed.
In addition, in what cases can the system fill in the Indirect Cost % field on the purchase invoice other than when the Overhead Rate or Indirect Cost % is specified on the Item Card?
Thanking You in Advance.
Regards,
Bea.
0
Comments
Look at where the indirect costs post, verify these accounts, post a revaluation journal on the item, look at the affect, then make the appropriate journal entries to reflect the true situation in the accounts.
Indirect cost % only come from the item card - it may say 0 now but it did not at one time, and when it is entered onto the purchase line the % is written at that time, so changing it to 0 on the item card does not affect any open order.
Revalution journal does not work for Entry type = Purchase.
It works olnly for Postitive adjustment.
In the UK this has worked fine on purchase revaluations since version dot, I have not tried this in 2009, but up until that version I can guarantee you you can revalue a purchase entry.
If you cannot do this how do you revalue a purchase entry on your system?
Is this a localisation restriction, or is mine a localisation opening?
If you go to the revaluation journal, enter a purchased item number and go to the applies to entry you are saying that only "positive" type entries are showing and not "purchase".
Can anyone else confirm/deny/try this please
Standard NAV revaluation journal works on purchases.
AP Commerce, Inc. = where I work
Getting Started with Dynamics NAV 2013 Application Development = my book
Implementing Microsoft Dynamics NAV - 3rd Edition = my 2nd book
In Indian Localization it does not work to Revalue the items with the Entry type = Purchase, Transfer, Out Put.
It works only for Positive.
You are really lucky to have that options.
So this is either a legal restriction, or there is another method/purpose for purchase revaluation I suppose.
Little point in the revaluation journal if it is only for positive entries, so the controls on the purchase invoice processing must be very tight indeed.
No PM,please use the forum. || May the <SOLVED>-attribute be in your title!