When we originally implemented NAV, we ran into issues running the NAV client over our existing Point-to-point DS1 (T1) connections. We quickly determined that it wasn't a great idea, and so we switched modes and implemented NAV on terminal services.
We're looking at restructuring our network, and one of the things being considered is an upgrade from DS1s (1.544 Mbps) to DS3s (45 Mbps), and we're wondering how NAV might perform as a locally-installed app with those speeds.
Obviously I can set up a private subnet and throttle it back to try to estimate how NAV might perform, but I thought I'd check here and see if anyone has had experience with it.
0
Comments
Also doen't forgett, with TS only the Keystrokes and the screen informations will be send and noth the whole datas like on direkt connection. And what is, if your provider has some problems or you have networkprobs because big down/uploads or what else or your have, becasue T3 is break down, only ISDN (64kbit or 128k) Power. With TS no problem, the user can work. Maybe u must there change the TS resolution but the user can work and the system doesn't hang .....
So, thats the reason why i would use TS. OK, you can became than some other probs like direkt mail integration .... but thats a other point ......
And yes, that still applies to the NAV2009 RTC as well.
RIS Plus, LLC
MVP - Business Apps
We were curious because our internal network at HQ is all 100 Mbps, and NAV runs over that network with no problem, so we were wondering if there was a breakpoint in bandwidth where it performs well.
Guess it's time to test.
Tried all configures but the result was the network of connection for 3gs was just to crap espically if you were in a builkding
MVP - Dynamics NAV
My BLOG
NAVERTICA a.s.
Example - you have a custom PDF process for some sales reports which 20 users require. This requires a PDF engine (i.e. automation control) and a codeunit that manages that control in NAV. If you were running with TS you may have a few TS machines that you have to install and maintain the PDF control on vs. having to worry about 20 different laptop/desktop machines. Also it tends to be easier to maintain TS and other server machines as those (normally) are in a more controlled/centralized environment, whereas desktops and laptops tend to migrate and can require a lot more running around to maintain.
Epimatic Corp.
http://www.epimatic.com