Hi Nav Masters,
I just want to ask something, is there anyone ever encounter a client who want to see original amount of a Journal (G/L Entry)?
Few of my client ask about them, and i don't know what is the correct answer to give them.
Why is it until Nav 5.1 still no "Original Amount" in G/L Entry table.
Is there anyway to answer why NAV don't have it until now?
Please advice,
Thanks in advance
______________
Regards,
Steven
0
Comments
I imagine the reason there is no original amount field is because of the transactional nature of accounting for the gL ledger.
Each affect on a GL account should be its own seperate entry so the total balance of the account can be affected otherwise a new subledger to the GL would be need similiar to the ILE VLE table.
If a client wants to see a original entry and subsequent entries that have affected this EG Sales invoices have goods returned and credit note sent. Then they should look at the CLE or GL entries with an appropriate filter EG doc or Cust NO.
Thanks for the fast reply.
What i mean with Original Amount is the original currency amount.
Example i make a journal with USD, but my LCY is SGD, so NAV will only keep LCY amount in GL Entry, so when my customer ask why don't have Original Amount in GL Entry i don't know how to answer them to make them understand.
Because its annoying they always compare with other system that they said have this field.
I'm a technical so i know i can get from CLE, VLE, or BALE for some transactions.
But if the Journal is G/L Account Type and the Balance is also G/L Account Type then i don't know.
Maybe should mod the G/L Entry table to add a field called "Original Amount"
Any comments / suggestions?
Thanks
Regards,
Steven
shown. What it sounds like you want is the additional reporting currency field to be activated however this will only work with one currency so unless the USD was the currency you used for GL FX postings the most this option may not suit you.
You can probably look to change your processes as well to so that a payment is credited against the correct customer / vendor by using a correct journal instead of the GL journal to directly enter different amounts to different accounts.
Also that amount you entered in USD is entered as LCY to show what that amount was worth at time of posting as amount may change in 2 days time due to exchange rates fluctations.
The limitation is that you can only use one additional currency.
Deep
India
www.corpital.com
Firstly this has nothing to do with Additional Reporting Currency, so don't look further at that.
The correct solution here is to train your users. If the client keeps asking you to modify their system to do what the old system used to do, then you need to ask "Why Are You Buying A New System?" better is just to go back to the old system.
Don't get me wrong, there are valid reasons to modify Navision to do something differently from how it does it out of the box, but these need to be valid business reasons. The old story "but our old system did it this way...." is NEVER a reason to start writing code.
Turkish localization has feature you ask. if you are partner,you can download it from partnersource.
I would assume having the original amount is a way to double check if the system is posting at a correct exchange rate. But when it posts FX adjustments if the currency changes, or was changed... how does it handle that? And how do you factor that into the double checking of the G/L ledger?
Best thing to do is to ask the user why he/she needs it, and possibly find a better way in NAV. NAV usually has more options than other systems, whether it's a small mod or out of the box.
http://www.inecta.com
Thank you for the replies.
@David : nice answer man, i agree with you, I'm sick of my client always compare NAV to their old system every time they cannot do a little thing that they usually do in their old system. Sometimes I want to tell them, "then just pay the rest of our money and use your old system", but cannot because as consultant and professional we have to watch what we say, hehehe
@ayhan06 : thank for the information, i am a partner, i will check this localization.
Anyway, Thank You all for the great suggestions and comments
Regards,
Steven