Howdy, Stranger!
Categories
- All Categories
- 73 General
- 73 Announcements
- 66.6K Microsoft Dynamics NAV
- 18.7K NAV Three Tier
- 38.4K NAV/Navision Classic Client
- 3.6K Navision Attain
- 2.4K Navision Financials
- 115 Navision DOS
- 854 Navision e-Commerce
- 1K NAV Tips & Tricks
- 772 NAV Dutch speaking only
- 615 NAV Courses, Exams & Certification
- 2K Microsoft Dynamics-Other
- 1.5K Dynamics AX
- 305 Dynamics CRM
- 109 Dynamics GP
- 10 Dynamics SL
- 1.5K Other
- 993 SQL General
- 384 SQL Performance
- 34 SQL Tips & Tricks
- 34 Design Patterns (General & Best Practices)
- Architectural Patterns
- 10 Design Patterns
- 5 Implementation Patterns
- 53 3rd Party Products, Services & Events
- 1.7K General
- 1.1K General Chat
- 1.6K Website
- 79 Testing
- 1.2K Download section
- 23 How Tos section
- 260 Feedback
- 12 NAV TechDays 2013 Sessions
- 13 NAV TechDays 2012 Sessions
Printing graphics
John_Tegelaar
Member Posts: 159
Does somebody know a way to get pictures on paper in the resolution of the printer? Now you are limited to a picturebox as this appears on screen, which means that your printed output is in approx. 75 DPI whereas your printer could handle 600 DPI or more.
Reason for asking this is that a customer wants have a signature printed on their invoice and with the current limitation it's not really nice looking (more correct: ugly).
To make a comparison: In Word you set the size of a picture and the original is resized to fit, using different (best possible) resolutions for screen and printer. Can such a kind of smart resizing be done in NF too?
[This message has been edited by John Tegelaar (edited 25-01-2000).]
Reason for asking this is that a customer wants have a signature printed on their invoice and with the current limitation it's not really nice looking (more correct: ugly).
To make a comparison: In Word you set the size of a picture and the original is resized to fit, using different (best possible) resolutions for screen and printer. Can such a kind of smart resizing be done in NF too?
[This message has been edited by John Tegelaar (edited 25-01-2000).]
0