License Permissions and NAS

RobertMo

I have troubles with properly running NAS.
In CU1 in function NASHandler CU6233 is used.

Question 1:
When I run with developers license (which has granule 1,420 Application Server 10) it is OK. Also if I check permissions range (CU6233 is in range)

When I run with users license (which has granule 1,415 Application server - each instance 1)it is NOT OK. If I check permissions range (CU6233 is not in range) ??

Which granule am I missing ?

Question 2:
Also when I run whit developers license, I have put some messages in CU1 and in CU6233, which should appear in Application log. The messages appear but only till the first usagge of CU6233 (CPApplnSrvMgt.SetNASID(ATASID);)?

Any idea what could be going on ?

Skeeve

You need to have the Commerce Portal granule on your client's license in order to use Commerce Portal

RobertMo

Well customer is not using CP, but add-on features develpoed by us. We thought as CU6233 has common name »Appln. Server Management" that it would be ok to have only licnese for App. server. Of course we developed and tested this on dev. license without a problem...

Ok, I will try to cahnge architecture of our add-on to by pass CU6233. My guess is to add a new CASE option in CU (after 'CG','MAILLOG','ADCS').
What do you think ?

BTW. What about Q2. Why not all messages apear in event log ?

Skeeve

That depends on where you put your messages. That codeunit is a single instance codeunit and constantly runs. You might actually hit your message only once!!

RobertMo

in CU1 in NASHandler I put:
...
IF NOT ATASStarted THEN BEGIN
MESSAGE('my msg 2'); //test
CPApplnSrvMgt.SetNASID(ATASID);
MESSAGE('my msg 3'); // test
...


There was a message 1 at the begining of NASHandeler func and it appeared in event log and also msg 2 apeared, but not msg 3.
Although the code after was run (there were some recoreds updated as evidence).

i would understand it, if this would not be run using dev. license ?