Performance problems in NAV 5.00 SP1 on SQL2005

Marco_Ferrari
Member Posts: 53
Hi all, we are experiencing a great performance problem in NAV 5.00 SP1 running on a SQL 2005 database. The problem arises when a user applies a filter on any standard form. Sometimes it has to wait more that 100 seconds in order to see the next record list when it press PagUp or PagDown or simply using the mouse trackball. Those filters were applied also before the porting, on a 4.03 database on SQL2000 and did not have problems.
Does anyone experienced the same problems?
Marco
Does anyone experienced the same problems?
Marco
0
Comments
-
Marco Ferrari wrote:Hi all, we are experiencing a great performance problem in NAV 5.00 SP1 running on a SQL 2005 database. The problem arises when a user applies a filter on any standard form. Sometimes it has to wait more that 100 seconds in order to see the next record list when it press PagUp or PagDown or simply using the mouse trackball. Those filters were applied also before the porting, on a 4.03 database on SQL2000 and did not have problems.
Does anyone experienced the same problems?
Marco
It could be a hundred different things, and without more information, any anser will just be a random guess.
But....
If I had to make a random guess, I would start by checking if you have any flowfields on the list form. That is a good place to start.David Singleton0 -
Yep, flowfields or variables that are calculated and displayed on the form. Anytime it has to calculate something it can take a while to move to the next record.
Past that, try running a SQL trace / running Client Monitor to see where it is spending all of it's time.0 -
There is a SQL 2005 patch that allows a new trace flag specifically for NAV. This makes the "like" behavior the same as SQL 2000. If your filter is doing a "LIKE" type operation, you could try this fix.David Machanick
http://mibuso.com/blogs/davidmachanick/0 -
[Topic moved from 'NAV/Navision' forum to 'SQL Performance' forum]Regards,Alain Krikilion
No PM,please use the forum. || May the <SOLVED>-attribute be in your title!0 -
Hi, no I talked about standard forms, so there are not any FlowField on the list form and many of those forms on which we have a problem are without code inside. There are also forms with code inside (as the form 232 of Customer Applying Entries) that have the same problem, but are in any case completely standard, without customization.
We installed the SQL Server patch (Trace Flag) but nothing changed.0 -
What is the version no. of your SQL2005? It should be atleast 09.00.3200 (SP2 with update package 4)Regards
Peter0 -
Just a quick question: How did you apply the trace flag ?
Because, adding it to the startup parameter in the service requires a restart for it to workDebugging is twice as hard as writing code. Therefore if you write the code as cleverly as possible you are by definition not smart enough to debug it.0 -
We have done it during the weekend. I will see the exact version of SQL and I will reply as soon as I can.
Thanks0
Categories
- All Categories
- 73 General
- 73 Announcements
- 66.6K Microsoft Dynamics NAV
- 18.7K NAV Three Tier
- 38.4K NAV/Navision Classic Client
- 3.6K Navision Attain
- 2.4K Navision Financials
- 116 Navision DOS
- 851 Navision e-Commerce
- 1K NAV Tips & Tricks
- 772 NAV Dutch speaking only
- 617 NAV Courses, Exams & Certification
- 2K Microsoft Dynamics-Other
- 1.5K Dynamics AX
- 320 Dynamics CRM
- 111 Dynamics GP
- 10 Dynamics SL
- 1.5K Other
- 990 SQL General
- 383 SQL Performance
- 34 SQL Tips & Tricks
- 35 Design Patterns (General & Best Practices)
- 1 Architectural Patterns
- 10 Design Patterns
- 5 Implementation Patterns
- 53 3rd Party Products, Services & Events
- 1.6K General
- 1.1K General Chat
- 1.6K Website
- 83 Testing
- 1.2K Download section
- 23 How Tos section
- 252 Feedback
- 12 NAV TechDays 2013 Sessions
- 13 NAV TechDays 2012 Sessions