Howdy, Stranger!
Categories
- All Categories
- 73 General
- 73 Announcements
- 66.6K Microsoft Dynamics NAV
- 18.6K NAV Three Tier
- 38.4K NAV/Navision Classic Client
- 3.6K Navision Attain
- 2.4K Navision Financials
- 115 Navision DOS
- 854 Navision e-Commerce
- 1K NAV Tips & Tricks
- 772 NAV Dutch speaking only
- 615 NAV Courses, Exams & Certification
- 2K Microsoft Dynamics-Other
- 1.5K Dynamics AX
- 297 Dynamics CRM
- 109 Dynamics GP
- 10 Dynamics SL
- 1.5K Other
- 993 SQL General
- 384 SQL Performance
- 34 SQL Tips & Tricks
- 34 Design Patterns (General & Best Practices)
- Architectural Patterns
- 10 Design Patterns
- 5 Implementation Patterns
- 53 3rd Party Products, Services & Events
- 1.7K General
- 1.1K General Chat
- 1.6K Website
- 79 Testing
- 1.2K Download section
- 23 How Tos section
- 259 Feedback
- 12 NAV TechDays 2013 Sessions
- 13 NAV TechDays 2012 Sessions
Item Tracking On Bom Compenents
Kim
Member Posts: 85
HI,
IM RUNNING NAV 4.02 AND HAVING A PROBLEM RECORDING ITEM TRACKING ON ITEM BOM JOURNAL.
IM USING DIRECTED-PUY AWAY ON MY WAREHOUSE.
I HAVE TRANSFERED THE BOM COMPONENTS TO THE BOM IN BOUND BIN.
WHEN TRYING TO POST THE ITEM BOM JOURNAL,I GET A MESSAGE OF UNDEFINED ITEM TRACKING CODES FOR THE BOM COMPONENTS.
HOW DO I RECORD THE ITEM TRACKING CODES ON COMPONETS BEING CONSUMED ON THE BOM JOURNAL?
IM RUNNING NAV 4.02 AND HAVING A PROBLEM RECORDING ITEM TRACKING ON ITEM BOM JOURNAL.
IM USING DIRECTED-PUY AWAY ON MY WAREHOUSE.
I HAVE TRANSFERED THE BOM COMPONENTS TO THE BOM IN BOUND BIN.
WHEN TRYING TO POST THE ITEM BOM JOURNAL,I GET A MESSAGE OF UNDEFINED ITEM TRACKING CODES FOR THE BOM COMPONENTS.
HOW DO I RECORD THE ITEM TRACKING CODES ON COMPONETS BEING CONSUMED ON THE BOM JOURNAL?
0
Comments
You cannot record item tracking codes on BOM Journals, the theory from Microsoft is if you want this complexity you should really be running Manufacturing (do not shoot the messenger). This is one of the oldest issues in Navision, people modify it I believe, not sure if it is available in V5, but Microsoft do not see this as a bug, just division of funcitonality.