TIP: Using a 3.70 client while programming a 3.60 database

eromein
Member Posts: 589
Hi,
(This was already posted on the wrong forum; this should be the right place.)
I'm using the 3.70 for programming course of the great new features. But here is the problem.
When programming in a 3.60 database, which will be used in combination with 3.60 clients, problems will occur if you compile objects (with your 3.70 client) that uses ocx components.
You can see it if you compile codeunit 423 Change log management with a 3.70 client. Open de database with a 3.60 again and try to (for expample) create a new sales order.
Hope this post makes any sence, and you will have gained some usefull knowlegde.
(This was already posted on the wrong forum; this should be the right place.)
I'm using the 3.70 for programming course of the great new features. But here is the problem.
When programming in a 3.60 database, which will be used in combination with 3.60 clients, problems will occur if you compile objects (with your 3.70 client) that uses ocx components.
You can see it if you compile codeunit 423 Change log management with a 3.70 client. Open de database with a 3.60 again and try to (for expample) create a new sales order.
Hope this post makes any sence, and you will have gained some usefull knowlegde.
"Real programmers don't comment their code.
If it was hard to write, it should be hard to understand."
If it was hard to write, it should be hard to understand."
0
Comments
-
Hi!
I'm using 3.70 client for 3.60 database programming, too.
There are only differences with the handling of RecordRef, FieldRef, ...
You can solve the problem, if you compile these objects with a 3.60 client.Timo Lässer
Microsoft Dynamics NAV Developer since 1997
MSDynamics.de - German Microsoft Dynamics Community - member of [clip]0 -
I tried that, didn't work. I had to manualy change the automation server to the old values. And trust me, it's a lot!"Real programmers don't comment their code.
If it was hard to write, it should be hard to understand."0 -
eromein wrote:(This was already posted on the wrong forum; this should be the right place.)Regards,Alain Krikilion
No PM,please use the forum. || May the <SOLVED>-attribute be in your title!0
Categories
- All Categories
- 73 General
- 73 Announcements
- 66.6K Microsoft Dynamics NAV
- 18.7K NAV Three Tier
- 38.4K NAV/Navision Classic Client
- 3.6K Navision Attain
- 2.4K Navision Financials
- 116 Navision DOS
- 851 Navision e-Commerce
- 1K NAV Tips & Tricks
- 772 NAV Dutch speaking only
- 617 NAV Courses, Exams & Certification
- 2K Microsoft Dynamics-Other
- 1.5K Dynamics AX
- 320 Dynamics CRM
- 111 Dynamics GP
- 10 Dynamics SL
- 1.5K Other
- 990 SQL General
- 383 SQL Performance
- 34 SQL Tips & Tricks
- 35 Design Patterns (General & Best Practices)
- 1 Architectural Patterns
- 10 Design Patterns
- 5 Implementation Patterns
- 53 3rd Party Products, Services & Events
- 1.6K General
- 1.1K General Chat
- 1.6K Website
- 83 Testing
- 1.2K Download section
- 23 How Tos section
- 252 Feedback
- 12 NAV TechDays 2013 Sessions
- 13 NAV TechDays 2012 Sessions