Hello,
I'm planning to do a upgrade of our existing Navision 3.7 to 5.1. Our partner suggests a "two-step" upgrade from 3.7 to 5.0 and from 5.0 to 5.1 because Microsoft recommends this procedure. They say that a direct upgrade to 5.1 is too much changing for one IT department because in 5.0 changes the design and in 5.1 the whole structure.
That sounds logical to me but it dobles my cost.
What do you think about that?
0
Comments
This means that if you prepare yourself by upgrading to 5.0 the 5.1 upgrade will be much easier.
No double costs but much less risks of things going wrong.
When customers are running on C/Side I even advise 3 steps, with SQL migration as extra step.
No PM,please use the forum. || May the <SOLVED>-attribute be in your title!
Portugal is one of the countries that don’t have 5.0 because doesn’t belongs to the first group of countries.
NAV 5.0 initially has to have the features of NAV 5.1, but MS to avoiding the delay released to versions.
I would advice to wait NAV 5.1, only upgrade to 5.0 if has features that you must implement in your business.
I always recommend waiting 3 or 4 months before to migrate to a new version.
Don’t hold you breathe for Navision 5.0 or 5.1 they are sill in beta.
Freelance Dynamics AX
Blog : http://axnmaia.wordpress.com/
Why not just wait for Microsoft to actually formally release the upgrade toolkit before recommending unofficial steps?
It's not uncommon to have Microsoft change their statements in the last minute.
AP Commerce, Inc. = where I work
Getting Started with Dynamics NAV 2013 Application Development = my book
Implementing Microsoft Dynamics NAV - 3rd Edition = my 2nd book
Freelance Dynamics AX
Blog : http://axnmaia.wordpress.com/
One of the scariest things is to allow ourselves to start making statements to customers that were never intended by Microsoft. The mind can create all sorts of fantasies when not controlled properly.
AP Commerce, Inc. = where I work
Getting Started with Dynamics NAV 2013 Application Development = my book
Implementing Microsoft Dynamics NAV - 3rd Edition = my 2nd book
I went to the roadshow in Detroit today and most of us agreed that the two step approach would work, it would basically be a two step approach to one upgrade, since there is no additional functionality planned between 5.0 and 5.1. But..... if it gets postponed even more who knows what gets put in there with the next 'service pack'.
RIS Plus, LLC
More bugs?
Independent Consultant/Developer
blog: https://dynamicsuser.net/nav/b/ara3n
Please correct me if i'm wrong :shock:
This is exactly why my advise is this. But Daniel is correct, is 5.1 get's delayed again, the situation might me different.
Nonetheless, it's still dangerous to try to sell what your expectations of 5.1 will be when it can be something completely different.
AP Commerce, Inc. = where I work
Getting Started with Dynamics NAV 2013 Application Development = my book
Implementing Microsoft Dynamics NAV - 3rd Edition = my 2nd book
I can go into a lot more detail about the 5.1 - 5.0 issue, but I should probably not.
RIS Plus, LLC
Hm :-k
Several of our customers already heared a great deal about 5.1 and are expecting a lot of it.
One is even dreaming of cutting off their yearly 20000 EUR maintenance to citrix thanks to the "3-tier" structure. Where do they get this? Don't know ... I guess they have their connections.
Already on a mission to talk this out of his head. #-o
Eric Wauters
MVP - Microsoft Dynamics NAV
My blog
RIS Plus, LLC
But I have to admit I feel the same
No PM,please use the forum. || May the <SOLVED>-attribute be in your title!
MVP - Dynamics NAV
My BLOG
NAVERTICA a.s.
They don't want to invest a lot of money in 5.0 to 5.1
It's going to be a while before 5.1 comes out. 5.0's upgrade toolkit is still not available. You may need to consider upgrading your client to an interim version if you are thinking of upgrading them to address some issues they are encountering.
The only thing you can expect to be added is some form revisions to accommodate easier transformation to the new client, and this would have to be done anyway, if you decide to wait for 5.1 or not.
An upgrade to 5.1 would include an object upgrade anyway, and keeping in mind that the functionality will be the same as 5.0, this would be the same amount of work, with the noted exception of some additional form changes. To repeat myself here: those form changes will have to be made anyway, whether you wait for 5.1 or upgrade to 5.0.
It does not make a difference whether you wait for 5.1 or go with 5.0 now. The object upgrade will have to be done anyway. Going with 5.0 now means that you will not have to do that later when you implement 5.1.
RIS Plus, LLC