can i get a show of hands..(or replys!) to who has passed the financial certification.
Prometric - MB7-225
Pearson - NAV-225
RECENTLY!
I need to know that the US Financial Certification is passable and that REAL LIFE users and consultants are passing this exam and understanding the questions and answers stated in the Microsoft test bank. - WITHOUT MEMORIZES THE QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS FROM SOME CLASS!
I am either in the wrong field or thier is something wrong with this test.
PLEASE RESPOND.
THANKS
0
Comments
I passed it about 1 month ago without too much studying time. What's the problem?
All of the questions on there I derive from implementation experience. Granted, that some of the questions were very vague with incorrect grammer.
AP Commerce, Inc. = where I work
Getting Started with Dynamics NAV 2013 Application Development = my book
Implementing Microsoft Dynamics NAV - 3rd Edition = my 2nd book
p.subhasish@gmail.com
Regards
Paul
Dynamics Nav Functional Consultant
I agree with Alex.
I passed it about 2 years ago, and even then the questions were vague.
My background is pure technical, so I found the exam a bit difficult :oops: .
Since I took the exam 2 years ago, I don't remember questions at all ...
And for the record (if numbers is what you need)...
In our company (iFacto nv) there are 7 people that have that certification.
Eric Wauters
MVP - Microsoft Dynamics NAV
My blog
p.s.: does financials I & II already exist?i've done financials only one or two weeks ago...and that was only one exam...
"Never memorize what you can easily find in a book".....Or Mibuso
My Blog
<raising hand> Passed it one year ago. I'm working as support consultant, therefore I could say this exam was easy. As some of these questions are frequently asked by clients.
@Belias
It's only one exam: MB7-225 Financials for Microsoft Dynamics NAV now.
Dynamics NAV Enthusiast
It's how the company wants to work. If the company expects the developer to understand the solution and decide themselves how to work it out ... then some background in this functionality is always useful. Actually we're talking about "Technical consultants" in this case.
But if the company has got strickt rules: functional description, technical description, ... . When developer gets an exact description of what tables/fields/codeunits/ ... it has to make ... then it's a little bit less useful.
Only my 2 cents
Eric Wauters
MVP - Microsoft Dynamics NAV
My blog
Hi Belias,
There are 2 books, Financials I and Financials II. Financials I is pure basics, Financials 2 is more specifically about Fixed Assets, Consolidation etc. The exam however is just 1