I am wondering whether I would get better performance from RAID 10 with 6 disks and with one database file, or having 3 database files RAID 1 with 2 disks each. This is using Navision Database Server.
Has anybody tried this combinations?
TIA,
Damir
0
Comments
The advantage with RAID10 is that you have 1 BIG logical drive and 1 BIG DB-file. This is advantageous for administrating, because you only have 1 DB-file.
No PM,please use the forum. || May the <SOLVED>-attribute be in your title!
The bottleneck for any one of the processes becomes how fast the disk system can service the request. One interesting approach is to combine the two solutions on large databases. That is create multiple database files, and place each on its own RAID 10 array. The configuration possibilities are limited only by imagination and budget.
In my former company, they (not me) did some kind of benchmark and 3 times RAID 1 seemed slightly better. (they did it with 4 sets and a database of 40GB).
bbrowns explanation confirms it again ...
Eric Wauters
MVP - Microsoft Dynamics NAV
My blog
RAID 0+1 or RAID 1?
Eric Wauters
MVP - Microsoft Dynamics NAV
My blog
MVP - Dynamics NAV
My BLOG
NAVERTICA a.s.
I thought that one RAID10 would be better solution, since all job with splitting and merging parts of data is done by controller.
However, it looks like Navision Server is doing admirable job.
Eric Wauters
MVP - Microsoft Dynamics NAV
My blog