Plz reply

subrata.bauri

Plz send me the correct answer. I have got question in this format......

116.What Internal document if we add field in table?

a)Documentation Trigger
b)Project Log
c)??
d)??

lessi

I vote for a)

Administrator

@BlackTiger

I have to warn you again that your behaviour is not accepted in this forum. Please read the forum rules if you don't know what I'm talking about: http://www.mibuso.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=9884 .

If you can't write messages with respect to others, please stay away from this forum.

Arjan_Somers

Although i agree, this also is a very bad post.

If the poster would have followed the Guidelines, he wouldn't have made this post.
He Should have asked his question in the:
"Questions in development exam"
topic, or if he really wanted to create a new topic, he should at least use another title.

"Plz Reply" is the most uninformative title i cant think of.

And making posts like this, can make some ppl a bit agressive :evil:

prassl

I also agree with arjan, that the title of this posting is not very informative, and that it would belong to the "Questions in development exam" thread.

Nevertheless, this is about sharing knowledge and helping people who are having problems, didn't we all have some trouble in the DEVII exam with some of those (not well formed) questions ?

Have a look at subrata's question:

Internal documentation -
A) documentation trigger
Field description

The 8359 (C/SIDE Introduction) guide says, the field description is used for internal documentation, whereas the 8401 (C/SIDE Solution development) guide says that the documentation trigger is used for this.
Also, when attending the MS 8401 Course, which I have, and seeing the original example (solved by MBS-people) of the implemented "trainer and courses module" you'll see some internal documentation in the field description there.

So, I personally think that this is not about stealing knowledge, but about asking for other people's opinions on a question that is not particularly clear to everyone.

If anyone knows what it is, (knowing <> guessing) please enlighten us.
I'd say "documentation trigger" though. makes more sense to me.

cheers,
manuela

prassl

don't worry I have... O:)

seems like he is in deep despair - his first posts were poorly phrased but somehow understandable, but now it's getting worse and worse, questions and titles are not understandable at all any more...

so I guess his situation must be really bad at work. #-o

and this is what we are here for: trying to HELP =D>

zeninoleg

I personally agree with BlackTiger(maybe not in a form). Everyone of us had to spend time going through documentation and trying to learn the BASICS. Some people just learn the questions, go pass the exam and call themselves "Microsoft Certified". SO the real meaning of being Certified is lost becuase at the first day of work these people will show "skills". And that makes all other Certified developers/Consultans look bad as well.

Miklos_Hollender

I think it goes deeper than that. Let's look a bit at the psychology of being an ERP analyst/developer.

This kind of job is all about building castles out of dry sh*t. Or in other words, despite the combined efforts of the vendor's stupidity and our client's stupidity, build something that works and is good. And there is one and only one personality attribute that can help you not getting disappointed, not giving up and deciding to blend in the mass of the 100000 faceless developers doing boring jobs, but keep on trying to make good ERP solutions: pride. Pride that we believe that we are a kind of "elite" (not in the literal sense of course) and despite all odds, we can make it into something good just as a kind of challenge. The ERP industry in general does not promise anything more than Churchill did: blood, sweat and tears - just look at the amazing Gartner Group figures that 35% of all projects fail outright and another 40% do not deliver the expected results. And why do we keep on? Out of pride. We want to show we can do better, we want to challenge the odds.

And if one has pride, one does not asks questions before doing a reasonable amount of research. Or sometimes he does, but not always. If one has pride, one always wants to show that he's not stupid, but just forgot or does not have the time to check some little detail.

If one does not have pride, if one does not want to challenge impossible odds, if one wants to be nurtured and looked after like a child, one does not belong in the ERP industry. ERP is an extreme sport.

Administrator, please do not bother BlackTiger about his direct and outspoken style towards knowledge vampires. I think many of us think similarly, only we do not say, for some reason or another. Those folks, their very existence in this profession is an insult to our pride. Not because they don't know much - we all were in this situation. But because they don't want to research, to experiment, to try to figure things out, because they lack the dedication, the cowboy mentality to challenge the odds.

But there is another thing. Please do not, any of us, neither Admin nor users, take this thing into a cultural/ethnical perspective. There are many great Indian developers. It's just by chance we managed to meet with the less great ones. I think in a few years they will come. Nowadays they are usually concentrating on Java instead of MS products.

Administrator

[Topic closed because:
- Subject is not descriptive
- Topic is in the wrong forum
- Thread has gone totally off topic]