Correcting finished Production order

qngo

How do I correct output journals for finished production orders? I need some way to correct the entries that were incorrect from the output journals. :?:

johnson_alonso

Dear qngo,
Finished production order can't be corrected through output journal, except you use reversing functionality, you simply just enter negative value into run time field and output field. Also, another option is item reclassification journal, where you can make a scrap location and put the unnecessary qty of output qty and prod. order have been finished and posted. Or in the item journal, you can adjust the inventory using negative adjustment.


rgds,
Johnson

qngo

I'm not sure if you're aware of the reputation of Techtura, but our going live was a disaster. Right now, we are trying desparately to correct these problems. We have Finished Production orders that did not have the correct figures, such as run time and output quantity. When you mention Reclassification journal, we not so sure how this will correct things. Another issue we're noticing is that we have lots of finished production orders that have a value of zero for Invoiced quantity. These orders are more than 6 months old. When and how does invoiced quantity receive a value?

Thanks for your help.

qngo

I'm not sure if you're aware of the reputation of Techtura, but our going live was a disaster. Right now, we are trying desparately to correct these problems. We have Finished Production orders that did not have the correct figures, such as run time and output quantity. When you mention Reclassification journal, we not so sure how this will correct things. Another issue we're noticing is that we have lots of finished production orders that have a value of zero for Invoiced quantity. These orders are more than 6 months old. When and how does invoiced quantity receive a value?

Thanks for your help.

ara3n

You can't blame a project failuers on NSC. The customer is in as much as fault as the consultants. So what kind of distarts did happen in your project?

qngo

I wasn't really trying to put the blame solely on them, but we were relying on the expertise to prepare us. First off, they made us pay for lots of customization that already existed out of the box. The most problematic was BOM items. For intl and our cust., we needed to show on the order and invoice the components of a BOM. Considering we are using 3.7, we were told that we couldn't use the BOM journal, and that we needed a customization for BOM items. Our customization was to the Explosion function from the sales order. This would bring in the components, but retain the price on the BOM, and zero out the components. We would then have to make manual adjustments to inventory for all BOM items in order to make a pick. This worked out fine, but for the G/L, our costing was doubled for all BOM items. We didn't know that the program didn't zero out the cost for the components. We quickly had to rectify this by zeroing out the cost for all BOM items, because components could be sold individually. Recently we are just beginning to notice problems with our WIP account and it was due to this customization. We could've easily used the BOM Journal, even though there was a bug. In order for us to use the BOM Journal, the BOM item and components can not have dimensions to it. Of course this was a fix in 4.0.

Other examples of customization not needed was archived quotes, ECO and CR (Jobs), Customer contracts (Price Grouping), and so forth.

We do not have a developers licence to make the necessary changes ourselves, but we entrusted the NSC because we lacked any knowledge of how Navision works.

Our primary focus is to fix our G/L in preparation for ending our fiscal year. [-o<