Howdy, Stranger!
Categories
- All Categories
- 73 General
- 73 Announcements
- 66.5K Microsoft Dynamics NAV
- 18.5K NAV Three Tier
- 38.4K NAV/Navision Classic Client
- 3.6K Navision Attain
- 2.4K Navision Financials
- 115 Navision DOS
- 854 Navision e-Commerce
- 1K NAV Tips & Tricks
- 772 NAV Dutch speaking only
- 615 NAV Courses, Exams & Certification
- 2K Microsoft Dynamics-Other
- 1.5K Dynamics AX
- 264 Dynamics CRM
- 109 Dynamics GP
- 10 Dynamics SL
- 1.5K Other
- 992 SQL General
- 384 SQL Performance
- 33 SQL Tips & Tricks
- 34 Design Patterns (General & Best Practices)
- Architectural Patterns
- 10 Design Patterns
- 5 Implementation Patterns
- 53 3rd Party Products, Services & Events
- 1.7K General
- 1.1K General Chat
- 1.6K Website
- 79 Testing
- 1.2K Download section
- 23 How Tos section
- 259 Feedback
- 12 NAV TechDays 2013 Sessions
- 13 NAV TechDays 2012 Sessions
Options
[SOLVED] BC - Charge Item from Purchase Document to Sales Document
boomerama
Member Posts: 6
Scenario:
I have a sales order with one line
Quantity 1
Price 1000 €
The sales order is delivered and invoiced.
Now I create a purchase invoice with a charge line of €100 and charge this to the sales shipment.
When I post the purchase invoice, I receive a g/l entry of €50. But the corresponding value item is negative.
According to this logic, the purchase price has not increased but decreased when the sales item is considered.
If you create the same case with a purchase credit memo, it behaves exactly the other way round, so that the credit memo is shown as an expense in sales (purchase price positive) instead of as revenue.
If the charge is divided equally between a purchase and a sales, the sum of the value entry is 0.
Can someone explain to me why the BC Standard does it this way?
I have a sales order with one line
Quantity 1
Price 1000 €
The sales order is delivered and invoiced.
Now I create a purchase invoice with a charge line of €100 and charge this to the sales shipment.
When I post the purchase invoice, I receive a g/l entry of €50. But the corresponding value item is negative.
According to this logic, the purchase price has not increased but decreased when the sales item is considered.
If you create the same case with a purchase credit memo, it behaves exactly the other way round, so that the credit memo is shown as an expense in sales (purchase price positive) instead of as revenue.
If the charge is divided equally between a purchase and a sales, the sum of the value entry is 0.
Can someone explain to me why the BC Standard does it this way?
0
Answers
No PM,please use the forum. || May the <SOLVED>-attribute be in your title!