Field No. 2 skiped in ledger entry tables....!

vijay_g · 2010-03-18

hi,
In ledger entry tables (customer,vendor,G/L) field no 2 is not placed.????

matttrax · 2010-03-18

You might want to be more specific.

Which ledger entry table?
What is field number 2? Don't expect people to go look this up.
What type of operation are you expecting to see the field filled in for?

kapamarou · 2010-03-18

Maybe an old field got removed at some point... :-k

matttrax · 2010-03-18

I completely read your post in a different way. I thought you meant a field wasn't being filled in.

I'm thinking now that you meant there is no field 2...is that right? If so, you are correct. There isn't one. Not sure when it was removed.

vijay_g · 2010-03-18

matttrax wrote:

I completely read your post in a different way. I thought you meant a field wasn't being filled in.

I'm thinking now that you meant there is no field 2...is that right? If so, you are correct. There isn't one. Not sure when it was removed.

yes i m asking abt missing field 2.

kapamarou · 2010-03-18

Throughout Nav you'll see a lot of gaps in numbering... It's normal...

In some cases these may be fields that existed in previous versions and got removed so for compatibility reasons the remain blank.

In other cases they will be missing in order to have consistency between tables and allow TRANSFERFIELDS command to work...

matttrax · 2010-03-18

It's even common to add field IDs in multiples of 10, so 50000, 50010, 50020, etc, so that you can add fields later and group like fields together.

No requirement that fields have to be sequential.

vijay_g · 2010-03-18

matttrax wrote:

No requirement that fields have to be sequential.

ya i know it but i was in confusion only cause of all ledger entry(17,21,25) have missed it.

by the way finish it.

Field No. 2 skiped in ledger entry tables....!

Comments

Categories