Outlook Integration - Allocation Entry

Louis
Louis Member Posts: 78
edited 2008-07-03 in NAV/Navision Classic Client
Hello
I try to use V5.0 - Outlook Integration on Table T05950
Unfortunately even with Deletion/Insertion/Modification entries in the Change Log Entries Table, the add-in doesn't reflect the changes in outlook.
Some field modifications (eg Allocation - Fielkd Description) seems to be ignored by the add-in. The synchronization progress shows the message :
"No data has been sent to NAV, no data has been receive in response."
With <Synch All> the Description modification appears !

A lot of strange behavior : duplicate entries, deletion in NAV not deleted in OL, ...etc.

Does someone encounter the same cases (other NAV entities than in DEMO MARKETING to synchronize with meeting in outlook) - and/or have tips to walk around these mulitple issues ?

TIA,
Louis ](*,)

Comments

  • ara3n
    ara3n Member Posts: 9,258
    Hello If the table is inserted by Code, Change log will not automatically be written.

    I suggest to add the the trigger oninsert code to write it to change log.

    Then find the code where it does the insert, modify,
    and change them to Insert(true), modify(true)
    Ahmed Rashed Amini
    Independent Consultant/Developer


    blog: https://dynamicsuser.net/nav/b/ara3n
  • Louis
    Louis Member Posts: 78
    Thanks for your response. That's what I had already done.
    The Change Log Entries are generated as expected.
    The issue is that... when using the same entries from the Change Log Entries table, the SYNCHRONIZE Button in Outlook doesn't have the same effect as the SYNCHRONIZE ALL Button !
    The SYNCH button says that no data has been changed (WRONG) !
    The SYNCH ALL button doesn't said that and it changes the entries correctly. But it is a SYNCH ALL and it is not the correct approach in Production Environment.

    Anyone else has tried OL V5 or V5SP1 ?
    ](*,)
  • ara3n
    ara3n Member Posts: 9,258
    In Outlook Synch. User Setup, what is the Synch. Direction?

    bi direction?
    Ahmed Rashed Amini
    Independent Consultant/Developer


    blog: https://dynamicsuser.net/nav/b/ara3n
  • Louis
    Louis Member Posts: 78
    No - At the moment I limit the expected result from NAV to OUTLOOK.

    We'll talk about "bi" later... after the proof of mono !
    L
    ](*,)

Categories